PERBANDINGAN METODE SAW DAN TOPSIS DALAM SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PENERIMA BANTUAN LANGSUNG TUNAI DI DESA LAMONGAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36002/jutik.v11i2.3883Keywords:
BLT, Decision Support System, SAW, TOPSISAbstract
The selection process for Direct Cash Assistance recipients in Lamongan Village is still conducted manually, leading to subjectivity and mistargeting. This study compares two Decision Support System (DSS) methos-Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) - to improve objectivity and efficiency in BLT selection. Five criteria were applied: income, housing, condition, health, number of dependents, and age, each assigned a weight based on importance. Data were collected 15 residents recommended by local leader. SAW determines preference scores through normalization and weighted summation, while TOPSIS calculates the distance of each alternative to positive and negative ideal solutions. Both methods identified the same top recipient, Yeni Avantari, with preference scores of 0.775 (SAW) and 0.819 (TOPSIS). Although their scores differ, both methods produced consistent and fair result. The study concludes that SAW and TOPSIS are equally effective in delivering accurate, objective, and well targeted decisions in BLT distribution.
References
[1] M. R. Z. Ahmad Farichin, “Analisis Perbandingan Metode SAW Dan TOPSIS Pada Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Dalam Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan (Study Kasus PT SKF Indonesia),” J. Inform. SIMANTIK, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 70–76, 2023.
[2] S. Paramita Djako, Meyko Panigoro, “Pengaruh Pemberian Bantuan Langsung Tunai (BLT) Terhadap Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Kecamatan Kota Timur Kota Goromtalo,” Jambura Econ. Educ. J., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 196–206, 2022.
[3] M. Muhibah Fata Tika, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerima Program Bantuan Sosial Menggunakan Metode SAW,” Emit. J. Tek. Elektro, vol. 21, no. 02, pp. 109–117, 2021.
[4] P. W. I Made Bramantia Santika Putra, Gabriel Firsta Adnyana, “Rancang Bangun Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Kredit Lpd Dengan Metode Saw Dan Topsis (Studi Kasus: LPD Desa Gumbrih, Jembrana – Bali),” JuTIK J. Teknol. Inf. dan Komput., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 199–206, 2024.
[5] W. E. Sari, M. B, and S. Rani, “Perbandingan Metode SAW dan Topsis pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerima Beasiswa,” J. Sisfokom (Sistem Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 52–58, 2021, doi: 10.32736/sisfokom.v10i1.1027.
[6] U. M. Rini Astuti, “Model Manajemen Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Metode Simple Additive Weighting untuk Program Bantuan Langsung Tunai di Desa Luwungbata,” Media Inform., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 88–97, 2020, doi: 10.37595/mediainfo.v19i3.47.
[7] Bakran, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelayakan Penerima Bantuan Langsung Tunai (BLT) Pada Desa Jelapat II Dengan Menggunakan Metode Simple Addtive Weighting (SAW),” Online Repos. Univ. NU Kalimantan Selatan, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2022.
[8] I. H. Rissa Nurfitriana Handayani, “Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Penentuan Calon Penerima Bantuan Langsung Tunai (Blt) Dengan Metode Saw,” J. Responsif Ris. Sains dan Inform., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 190–195, 2022.
[9] Z. R. Nisa Imania, Junaidi Salat, Rahmad Rizki, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Skincare Untuk Wajah Sensitif Di Klinik Kecantikan La Beautee Care Blok Sawah Dengan Menggunakan Metode Topsis Dan Metode Saw Berbasis Web,” J. Real Ris., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 219–226, 2023, doi: 10.47647/jrr.v5i1.1149.
[10] A. F. Yulisman, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Penerima Bantuan Rumah Sehat Layak Huni Menggunakan Metode SAW di Desa Pasir Emas Kecamatan Singingi,” J. Inform., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 39–50, 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JUTIK : Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
