PENGUKURAN PENERIMAAN PENGGUNA APLIKASI INDODAX MELALUI PENDEKATAN EXTENDED TAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36002/jutik.v12i2.4050Keywords:
eTAM, indodax, risk, technology adoption, trustAbstract
The rapid development of blockchain technology and the growing popularity of cryptocurrencies in Indonesia have driven the adoption of various crypto trading applications, one of which is Indodax. However, user acceptance of the application still faces several challenges, including perceived R, T issues, and interface complexity. This study aims to measure user acceptance of the Indodax application using the Extended Technology Acceptance Model (eTAM), which includes seven constructs: Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU), Perceived Usefulness (PU), ATU Toward Using (ATU), Behavioral Intention to Use (BITU), Actual Use (AU), T (T), and R (R). A quantitative approach was applied using a Likert-scale questionnaire distributed to 420 active Indodax users. Data were analyzed using the Partial Least Square–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) method to examine the relationships among constructs. The findings indicate that PEOU, PU, and T significantly influence users’ ATUs and intentions to use the application, while R has a negative effect on both T and ATU. These results emphasize the importance of enhancing user T and minimizing perceived R to foster sustained adoption. The implications of this study can inform developers of crypto applications in designing more user-friendly, secure, and Tworthy platforms.
References
[1] Badan Pengawas Perdagangan Berjangka Komoditi (Bappebti), “Statistik Pasar Fisik Aset Kripto,” 2022.
[2] V. Venkatesh, J. Thong, and X. Xu, “Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead,” J Assoc Inf Syst, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 328–376, 2020, doi: 10.17705/1jais.06464.
[3] B. Alasmary and C. Morosan, “Trust and acceptance of cloud-based identity management systems in higher education: An empirical investigation,” Comput Human Behav, vol. 107, p. 105716, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.105716.
[4] R. Kumar, Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners, 5th ed. SAGE Publications, 2020.
[5] J. F. Hair, M. Sarstedt, C. M. Ringle, and N. P. Danks, Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook. Springer Nature, 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7.
[6] V. Venkatesh and H. Bala, “Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions,” Decision Sciences, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 273–315, 2020, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x.
[7] C. Tam and T. Oliveira, “Understanding mobile banking individual performance: The DeLone & McLean model and the moderating effects of individual culture,” Internet Research, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 229–251, 2021, doi: 10.1108/INTR-07-2019-0300.
[8] Y. K. Dwivedi, N. P. Rana, A. Jeyaraj, M. Clement, and M. D. Williams, “Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): Towards a revised theoretical model,” Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 23, pp. 719–734, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10796-019-09977-4.
[9] B. Marakarkandy, N. Yajnik, and C. Dasgupta, “Enabling trust in e-commerce: An empirical investigation,” Electron Commer Res Appl, vol. 45, p. 101034, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2020.101034.
[10] W. Wei, Y. Lu, and B. Wang, “Perceived risk and consumer trust in online services: The moderating role of need for cognition,” Information & Management, vol. 57, no. 2, p. 103185, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2019.103185.
[11] E. O.-W. Ayaburi and D. N. Treku, “Effect of data privacy concerns on employee behavior: A study of mobile health apps,” Information Technology & People, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 889–910, 2021, doi: 10.1108/ITP-07-2019-0389.
[12] I. G. S. Aryandana, L. A. Susanti, P. E. Suardana, and P. V. Nugraha, “Pengujian kualitas website Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil (DUKCAPIL) Kota Denpasar Bali menggunakan metode System Usability Scale (SUS),” JUTIK: Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 14–25, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.36002/jutik.v11i1.3747.
[13] J. Charan and T. Biswas, “How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research,” Indian J Psychol Med, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 531–534, 2021, doi: 10.1177/02537176211036690.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JUTIK : Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
