AI-Aesthetic TPACK: Redesigning Art Teacher Education in the Age of Generative AI

Isi Artikel Utama

Lihui

Abstrak

Generative text-to-image systems lower technical barriers to visual production but can also short-circuit learning if used end-to-end. This paper proposes AI-Aesthetic TPACK, a framework that aligns Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) and Human-out-of-the-Loop (HOTL) workflows to Leder’s five stages of aesthetic processing (perceptual analysis, implicit memory integration, explicit classification, cognitive mastering, evaluation) and operationalizes it as a classroom toolkit: (a) a behavior-anchored competency rubric for teacher education; (b) a Process-Based Evidence Package (PBEP) template that makes creative processes visible and assessable; and (c) a course-level AI use & disclosure policy. Using a PRISMA-ScR–guided scoping synthesis, we distill design patterns that preserve stage-specific learning while leveraging AI for ideation and iteration. A 90-minute micro- trial with three experienced art instructors shows moderate inter-rater agreement when applying the rubric to a PBEP-documented student project (κoverall = 0.65; κdimension = 0.58–0.73). Qualitative debriefs reveal consistent pain points (e.g., ambiguity around licensing of texture assets) and lead to a shared casebook for future calibration. Contributions are: (1) a stage-aligned mapping of AI interventions with scaffold/shortcut conditions; (2) a ready-to-use toolkit (rubric + PBEP + policy) with evidence anchors; and (3) initial usability/consistency signals for short-format teaching. We conclude with boundary conditions, cultural considerations, and a data/materials availability statement to support replication and local adaptation.

Rincian Artikel

Cara Mengutip
Lihui. (2026). AI-Aesthetic TPACK: Redesigning Art Teacher Education in the Age of Generative AI. International Conference on Fundamental and Applied Research (I-CFAR), 2(1), 366–384. https://doi.org/10.36002/icfar.v2i1.5188
Bagian
Articles

Referensi

1]. Abdullahi Yusuf, A., Pervin, N., & Román-González, M. (2024). Generative AI and the future of higher education: A threat to academic integrity or reformation? Evidence from multicultural perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1),

Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00453-6

[2]. Agudo, I., Arrese, J., Liberal, A., & Matute, H. (2022). Assessing emotion and sensitivity of AI artwork. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 879088. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.879088

[3]. Dietvorst, B. J., Simmons, J. P., & Massey, C. (2015). Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(1), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000033

[4]. Horton, C. B., White, M. W., & Iyengar, S. S. (2023). Bias against AI art can enhance perceptions of human creativity. Scientific Reports, 13(1), Article 19001. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023- 45202-3

[5]. Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369811

[6]. Logg, J. M., Minson, J. A., & Moore, D. A. (2019). Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 151, 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.005

[7]. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

[8]. Natarajan, S., Mathur, S., Sidheekh, S., Stammer, W., & Kersting, K. (2025). Human-in-the-loop or AI-in-the-loop? Automate or collaborate? In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 39(27) (pp. 28594–28600). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v39i27.35083

[9]. Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters,

M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., et al. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–

473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

[10].Wen, W., & Wen, H. (2024). Bridging generative AI technology and teacher education: Understanding preservice teachers’ processes of unit design with ChatGPT. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 24(4). Retrieved from https://citejournal.org/volume- 24/issue-4-24/general/bridging-generative-ai-technology-and-teacher-education-understanding- preservice-teachers-processes-of-unit-design-with-chatgpt

[11].Zhang, Y., & Gosline, R. (2023). Human favoritism, not AI aversion: People’s perceptions (and bias) toward generative AI, human experts, and human–GAI collaboration in persuasive content generation. Judgment and Decision Making, 18(6), 1485–1503. https://doi.org/10.1017/jdm.2023.37