Mapping the Scope and Maturity of Digital Technology Applications in Education: A Systematic Review
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
To comprehensively investigate the current state of digital education scenario applications in China, this study employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach to analyze the scope and maturity of digital technology applications in educational contexts between 2014 and 2024. By integrating educational scenarios with the “People–Process–Technology” (PPT) theory and the Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI), the study constructs a comprehensive “Educational Scenario–PPT Dimension–Maturity Model” framework to systematically analyze and reveal the developmental characteristics of digital transformation in education. The results indicate that: (1) the number of publications in the CNKI sample showed a fluctuating pattern from 2014 to 2021, with a resurgence after 2020 driven by policy initiatives and the COVID-19 pandemic; international research demonstrated a consistent growth trend, particularly accelerating after 2023 due to the influence of generative AI and large language models (LLMs); (2) research focus predominantly centered on teaching and learning scenarios, while areas such as home–school interaction, educational services, and educational practice remained underexplored; (3) higher education represented a research hotspot, whereas preschool and vocational education received relatively limited attention; and (4) most digital applications in educational scenarios were in the transition from “basic” to “mature” stages, with only a few achieving “optimized” or “leading” levels. This study provides a comprehensive analytical perspective for understanding digital transformation in education and offers insights for policy formulation, digital transformation practices, and future research directions.
Rincian Artikel

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
![]()
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Referensi
Bozkurt, A., Xiao, J., Lambert, S., Pazurek, A., Crompton, H., Koseoglu, S., Farrow, R., Bond, M., Nerantzi, C., & Honeychurch, S. (2023). Speculative futures on ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence (AI): A collective reflection from the educational landscape. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 53–130. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7636568
Luo, N., Zhang, M., & Qi, D. (2017). Effects of different interactions on students’ sense of community in e-learning environment. Computers & Education, 115, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.006
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
Zhao, Y., & Watterston, J. (2021). The changes we need: Education post COVID-19. Journal of Educational Change, 22(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09417-3
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2016). Notice of the Ministry of Education on issuing the Thirteenth Five-Year Plan for educational informatisation. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s3342/201606/t20160622_269367.html
Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
Korang, V., & Atianashie, M. (2025). Digital transformation: Business process management in the service sector. In J. Chaki & M. Wozniak (Eds.), Building dynamic business communities (pp. 298–327). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003528000-17
Xing, X., Hu, J., & Guan, J. (2022). Digitalization of basic education in the new era: Developmental motivations, basic features, and practical approaches. China Educational Technology, 2022(12), 107–113. Al-Ajlan, A., & Zedan, H. (2020). Smart education and the future of digital learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 107, 106279. Chen, X., & Yu, L. (2022). Digital transformation of education in China: Policy, practice and evaluation. Educational Research Review, 37, 100469. Heick, T. (2023). The role of large language models in 21st-century learning. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 16(2), 15–28. Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Keele University. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. Li, J., & Zhao, H. (2021). The maturity evaluation of smart campus construction: A CMMI-based approach. Journal of Educational Technology, 42(6), 45–52. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. OECD. (2023). Digital education outlook 2023: Pushing the frontiers with AI. OECD Publishing. Qian, M., & Clark, K. (2016). Game-based learning and 21st century skills: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 50–58. Sun, P. C., & Chen, L. (2020). A systematic review of online learning effectiveness. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1013–1039. UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing. Wang, Y., & Li, X. (2024). AI-driven education reform in China: From policy to classroom practice. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(5), 1987–2003. Zhao, F., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Assessing the digital readiness of schools: An empirical study based on the PPT model. Computers & Education, 157, 103967. Zhou, M., & Xu, J. (2023). Exploring teachers’ digital competence under the influence of AI technologies. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 5147–5165. Benavides, L. M. C., Tamayo Arias, J. A., Arango Serna, M. D., Branch Bedoya, J. W., & Burgos, D. (2020). Digital transformation in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Sensors, 20(11), 3291. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113291
Bi, J. G., Dong, Y. Q., & Han, Y. (2019). Designing an online learning activity model to promote the development of critical thinking. Distance Education in China, (6), 33–40+91. Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Butler-Henderson, K., & Crawford, J. (2020). A systematic review of online examinations: A pedagogical innovation for scalable authentication and integrity. Computers & Education, 159, 104024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104024
CMMI Product Team. (2010). Improving processes for developing better products and services (Technical Report No. CMU/SEI-2010-TR-033). Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute. Fang, C. S., & Bai, F. (2022). Regional alliance comprehensive teaching research model and practice under the background of educational digital transformation. China Educational Technology, (8), 124–127. Farias-Gaytan, S., Aguaded, I., & Ramirez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Transformation and digital literacy: Systematic literature mapping. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 1417–1437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10624-x
Feng, J. F., Wang, Y. N., & Bai, Y. T. (2022). The landscape and prospects of research on teachers’ digital competence: An analysis based on international literature. Teacher Education Research, 34(2), 118–128. Hidayat, D. N., Lee, J. Y., Mason, J., & Khaerudin, T. (2022). Digital technology supporting English learning among Indonesian university students. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 17(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-022-00185-z
Hu, J., Peng, H. C., & Zhu, Z. T. (2022). The practical predicament and breakthrough path of educational digital transformation. Modern Distance Education Research, 34(5), 72–81. Kim, T., & Lim, J. (2019). Designing an efficient cloud management architecture for sustainable online lifelong education. Sustainability, 11(6), 1523. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061523
Li, F., Gu, X. Q., Cheng, L., & Liao, Y. D. (2022). The policy logic, internal drivers, and promotion paths of educational digital transformation. Open Education Research, (4), 93–101. Li, M. L., & Xu, T. (2018). Review and prospect: Research on the social identity of vocational education. Vocational & Technical Education Forum, (11), 18–23. Lu, C., Tsai, C.-C., & Wu, D. (2015). The role of ICT infrastructure in its application to classrooms: A large-scale survey for middle and primary schools in China. Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 249–261. Ma, J. S., & Zou, W. (2019). On the school and its functions. Tsinghua Journal of Education, 40(4), 23–31. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2012). Notice of the Ministry of Education on issuing the ten-year development plan for education informatization (2011–2020). http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s3342/201203/t20120313_133322.html
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2020a). Notice from the Office of the Leading Group for the Response to the Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia Epidemic of the Ministry of Education on supporting education and teaching with informatization during epidemic prevention and control. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s3342/202002/t20200214_421005.html
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2020b). 2019 national education funding statistics bulletin. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/202006/t20200612_465295.html
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2021). 2020 national education funding statistics bulletin. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/202104/t20210427_528812.html
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2022a). 2021 national statistical bulletin on educational development. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/sjzl_fztjgb/202209/t20220914_660850.html
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2022b). Key tasks of the Ministry of Education in 2022. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/202202/t20220208_597666.html
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Physical Therapy, 89(9), 873–880. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/89.9.873
Paulk, M. C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M. B., & Weber, C. V. (1993). Capability maturity model for software, version 1.1 (Technical Report No. CMU/SEI-93-TR-024). Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 372, n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160